Wiki 24:Featured article candidates

Featured Articles are examples of some of the best work available on Wiki 24, and are highlighed on the main page each month. Criteria for a featured article are that it is well-written, informative, accurate, and that it covers all available information on the subject. The article must also be undisputed and stable, without any on-going edit wars or major disputes. Any previously featured articles are ineligible for nomination, however previously nominated articles can be nominated again if they've failed to become featured.

Nominating and voting
Any registered user that has been in existence for at least two weeks and with at least twenty significant contributions can vote on nominations. To nominate an article, add it to the list below, including the reason(s) why you think it should be nominated. When voting, write "SUPPORT" or "OPPOSE" beneath the nomination with your reasons. Each person gets one Support and one Oppose vote per month. The deadline is 12:00am (UTC) on the second day of the month. You must be logged in when voting and you must sign your vote by adding " ~ ".

Tony Almeida

 * SUPPORT: I think this article should be nominated because it is well written and has been collaborated on by a lot of people. Plus, he's a really cool character.--24 Administration 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * SUPPORT: Yeah, Tony is really cool. The article is well written.--24 Administration 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * OPPOSE: This article is rubbish! --24 Administration 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Noah Daniels

 * SUPPORT: The Daniels article is thorough but still interesting. --Protocol Red 20:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * OPPOSE: Although the character was involved a good deal throughout season 6, I have a feeling that he'll be a rather forgettable character a couple years down the road. I don't believe his character will be worth noting as a featured article. --Deege515 22:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Christopher Henderson

 * SUPPORT: Henderson's article is a thorough, well presented article, showing the obvious linguistical skill of the creator/s. Plus, Henderson was a very important character in the events of Day 5. --BillBuchanan24 11:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * SUPPORT: Yes ! Plus, Henderson was a very important character before the events of Day 5. And, his article is very good with their images. --Strike07 14:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * SUPPORT: Yeah, especially since he was an important character, and one of the greatest "patriots". The article supports him well too. Ali 17:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)