24: Prefix[]
Why does this category (and all it's subcategories) have the "24:" prefix on it? No others do, do they? --Proudhug 23:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I never liked that either. The only explanation is that since no one changed it, the subsequent spin-off categories that were made were named with the "24:" in it to respect the precedent. Should we change them all? A pain in the ass for sure, but perhaps it's necessary. Also I suspect it will look much better at the bottom of those pages too. Change or leave? Blue Rook talk contribs 23:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
I say change, for sure. There's no reason to keep it the way it is, except laziness (it is gonna be a pain in the ass). And that's not actually a reason. --Proudhug 23:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Alrighty, it's being worked on. I saved this convo too as the new categ's talk page, in case someone would like the source discussion for all the changes.