9,373 Pages

Useful? Edit

Do we really need this? --Proudhug 03:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes and no. No because it's already stated that the specific character cannot be specified in each background/notes section already. Yes because it might be interesting to catalogue these characters by the unusual phenomenon which they all have in common. I know, I sound like a politician, but I'm undecided about this. Blue Rook  talk  contribs 04:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
I've started to like this category and have added some characters to it. I also just a few seconds ago narrowed the scope of the category, to make sure it's for visual-appearances characters only, which means it won't include cases like Davies and Matthews (Day 5), where one of them might have been heard only. But I'm still on the fence about it, and if a convincing argument against it comes up sometime soon, I might be inclined to agree. Blue Rook  talk  contribs 12:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.