(Created page with "{{Forum|The Situation Room}} <!-- To newcomers: remember to sign your edits with four tildes! This means you must type ~~~~ after your message. --> I think there should be a ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think there should be a hierarchy of wiki 24 members, i.e. a president and vice president [[User:Scott.mck|Scott.mck]] 18:44, January 6, 2012 (UTC) |
I think there should be a hierarchy of wiki 24 members, i.e. a president and vice president [[User:Scott.mck|Scott.mck]] 18:44, January 6, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | : Well, for what it's worth, there has always been a strong sense of "democratic equals" at this project. If you visit [[Wiki 24:Administrators]] and [[Wiki 24:Rollback]], for example, right after the first sentence of each is the policy component that users with extra access rights do not overrule other users simply by virtue of their extra abilities. I'm not confident that this sort of idea would gain traction. {{User:Blue Rook/Sig}} 22:56, January 6, 2012 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 22:56, 6 January 2012
Forum: The Situation Room > Making a wiki 24 hierarchy
I think there should be a hierarchy of wiki 24 members, i.e. a president and vice president Scott.mck 18:44, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Well, for what it's worth, there has always been a strong sense of "democratic equals" at this project. If you visit Wiki 24:Administrators and Wiki 24:Rollback, for example, right after the first sentence of each is the policy component that users with extra access rights do not overrule other users simply by virtue of their extra abilities. I'm not confident that this sort of idea would gain traction. Blue Rook talk contribs 22:56, January 6, 2012 (UTC)