ㅤ

Editing

Forum:Manual of Style disambiguation changes proposal

1
  • The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit. If you are undoing an edit that is …
Latest revision Your text
Line 57: Line 57:
   
 
: Yeah, I wouldn't have interpreted it that way, but I see how you can. I would be very surprised if that was actual criteria for exclusion. So why do you still make the recommendation since it seems to be incorrect? --[[User:Proudhug|Proudhug]] 19:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 
: Yeah, I wouldn't have interpreted it that way, but I see how you can. I would be very surprised if that was actual criteria for exclusion. So why do you still make the recommendation since it seems to be incorrect? --[[User:Proudhug|Proudhug]] 19:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 
:: I still recommend using the redirects because 1) it's simpler and much faster to do, 2) this is the function of redirects after all, and 3) it shaves down on the amount of pages that are listed in Special:Disambiguations. Even though it doesn't affect the total article count, those three reasons are good enough for me :){{User:Blue Rook/Sig}} 21:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 
  Loading editor
Below are some commonly used wiki markup codes. Simply click on what you want to use and it will appear in the edit box above.

View this template