Edit Page
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:: I agree, but how do you think is a good way to word that for the policy? Just "no proper nouns in IU articles unless they have articles"? That means we would still allow "Dana Walsh was then waterboarded", or "Jack then pulled out a dual-action 9mm tactical assault rifle". Saying "no technical terms" isn't a specific thing, as if we're being pedantic the word "door" could be classed as a technical term. We could say "exercise judgement by not going into too much extraneous detail when describing objects not identified in-universe"--[[User:Acer4666|Acer4666]] 10:50, April 21, 2011 (UTC) |
:: I agree, but how do you think is a good way to word that for the policy? Just "no proper nouns in IU articles unless they have articles"? That means we would still allow "Dana Walsh was then waterboarded", or "Jack then pulled out a dual-action 9mm tactical assault rifle". Saying "no technical terms" isn't a specific thing, as if we're being pedantic the word "door" could be classed as a technical term. We could say "exercise judgement by not going into too much extraneous detail when describing objects not identified in-universe"--[[User:Acer4666|Acer4666]] 10:50, April 21, 2011 (UTC) |
||
β | |||
β | ::: Haha, the way you put it, I couldn't have phrased it better myself, besides throwing in something like "...by avoiding [[oou]] proper nouns unless deemed necessary for understanding an event". {{User:Blue Rook/Sig}} 14:40, April 21, 2011 (UTC) |