Replacement?
New image[]
Does anyone else agree that this image is a better one? This new one is definitely a clearer view of the character's face. The old one is horizontally-oriented and just looks rather odd overall to me. Blue Rook talk contribs 12:30, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
- I agree this image is a better one - but is there a shot of him looking a little less happy and a little more evil? I'll have a look myself, I'm probs being too picky, as it's undoubtedly a better shot of his face--Acer4666 18:43, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
- He turned out to be rather difficult to get a good image of; this is the best I could do. I was originally looking for an image that clearly showed a person "on the run" in a "hunted" kind of way, but all those shots are generally some combo of bad angle and unfortunate lighting. He doesn't look like the "prey" I wanted to find in this new picture, but the "happy" does strike me as a kind of "psycho" grinning, which suffices as a substitute for me. (It's when he escapes temporarily from Jack in the car chase.) Blue Rook talk contribs 23:55, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
Alias or not?[]
Now that we've seen the name Arthur Rabens on the CIA file, can we say now that this name isn't an alias, since the CIA has a file about it? --Station7 (talk) 13:33, May 25, 2014 (UTC)
- The article doesn't say the name is an "alias", but rather that Saunders said his name could be an alias. If it's something that Saunders actually said IU, then I think it's worth leaving. For all we know, the "alias" could be the only thing the CIA had to go with... But regardless of that, whether it's an alias or not doesn't affect or alter the rest of the article since nothing else is mentioned about it. Thief12 (talk) 14:00, May 25, 2014 (UTC)