Bold[]
What exactly does the bolding of a name denote on these pages? --proudhug 01:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind. I see the Day 5 page states that it denotes a high-ranking antagonist. It seems an anonymous user has quite liberally peppered boldings all over these pages. We need to either decide which characters deserve to be bolded, or remove the bolds altogether. I vote for the latter, since it's arbitrary otherwise. --proudhug 01:42, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Sherry Palmer[]
I don't think Sherry was involved in George Ferragamo's murder. So, I think she should be removed from the list. Sk84life 19:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- But her entry here doesn't even claim she was involved with the Ferragamo incident. All it says she was involved with was the Gibson death cover-up and attempted destruction of evidence, two things she definitely is guilty of. Blue Rook talk contribs 20:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, but the whole reason why Carl, Bob, and Phil are on this list is because they commited a murder. If they hadn't, they wouldn't be eligible to be on the list. That's the way I see it. Sk84life 03:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- So you're just saying that she doesn't belong in that heading? She's definitely an antagonist, so she belongs on this page. I think the problem is that you see two "political scandals": Ferragamo's death and Gibson's death. Carl was involved in both, but the others were only involved in one. Personally, I see them as both being a part of the same scandal. Just because Sherry didn't participate in murder doesn't mean she's not an antagonist. --Proudhug 03:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- I thought Sherry was involved in both and the others in one. So then should Sherry be categorized into "Category:Day 1 antagonists"? That would make her an antagonist in the first 3 seasons. Wow. Sk84life 04:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)