Should we disambiguate this at the top towards Norton Airfield? Thief12 (talk) 12:26, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
Yep - I think we should!--Acer4666 (talk) 12:27, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
Antagonist[]
I think that if Hanilin can be considered a antagonist, for disrupting CTU's efforts, this judge should also qualify. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.120.54.154 (talk) .
Who do you mean by Hanilin? Regarding Norton, I disagree, because he wasn't an antagonist any more than Kim was for distracting Jack during Day 2. He was a legitimate judge doing his job, with no intention to aid or abet terrorists. BlueRooktalkcontribs 02:00, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
