Doesn't this page's existence go against our disambig policy? --Proudhug 01:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- No, how come? .. see here and read the "For example" paragraph. Right? You're the man who helped me formulate this stuff! Blue Rook talk contribs 03:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Damn, and I thought we'd finally clarified all that, but I guess we missed this. I think a case like this one (unaddressed in the MoS, it seems) doesn't fit that same criteria. Currently, there is only one other character with the name Masters, so it doesn't make sense to me to need anything more than a disambiguation note on Masters page (and no disambig page). Does this seem like a reasonable revision/addition? --Proudhug 04:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Okay sounds good... would you mind checking the MoS changes I just made, make sure they're right? I'll fix the Masters case, and any others I come upon later retroactively. Blue Rook talk contribs 14:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Looks good. Until we come upon another issue, of course. :) --Proudhug 01:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)