Wiki 24:Featured article candidates

Nominate and vote for the next Article of the Month here.

Eligibility

The only thing an article needs to be nominated is for it not to have been a previous Article of the Month. Everything else is up to the voters to decide!

See a list of past Article of the Month here.

See a list of past nominated articles here.

How to nominate

Please add your nominations below. You need to include the article name (linked to the article) and reasons why you think it should be nominated. Below is an example.

Tony Almeida

• SUPPORT: I think this article should be nominated because it is well written and has been collaberated on by a lot of people. Plus, he's a really cool character.--24 Administration 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

How to vote

When voting, you should either write SUPPORT, REJECT or NEUTRAL beneath the nomination with your reasons. You msut be logged in when voting and you must sign your vote by adding --~~~~ to the end of your vote. Again, below is an example.

Tony Almeida

• SUPPORT: I think this article should be nominated because it is well written and has been collaberated on by a lot of people. Plus, he's a really cool character.--24 Administration 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• SUPPORT: Yeah, Tony is really cool. The article is well written.--24 Administration 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• REJECT: This article is rubbish! --24 Administration 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Featured Article Nominations

Please nominate articles which highlight the wonderful work the editors have done with the 24 wiki. The winning article will become the feature article on the main page during the month of August.

If you nominate a new article, please add "SUPPORT" and your reasons for nominating the article.

If you are voting for an existing nominee, please add "SUPPORT", "REJECT" or "NEUTRAL" and any comments you have.

Don't forget to timestamp your posts with ~~~~.

University of California, Santa Barbara

• SUPPORT: A very nicely written and informative article on a location. Also, it's a place from a couple years ago, so it's a good refresher. --StBacchus 12:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

CTU Los Angeles Building

• SUPPORT: Quite an informative article which I believe it quite well written. I think it provides interesting information about something which fans may not be aware of. --24 Administration 18:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Attacks on CTU Los Angeles

• SUPPORT: An informative article which brings together all the information about the subject from across the series. I think fans would find it quite interesting. --24 Administration 18:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• SUPPORT: <-- That explains it.--CWY2190 02:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• REJECT: I was looking over this article and the talk page, and I have to agree with some of the comments on the talk page... I don't feel like this page is even necessary, much less worth making the "Featured Article." I like all of the information and photos on the page, but I think it would be better suited to be a sub-section of the CTU Los Angeles page rather than an independent article. -Kapoli 03:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• REJECT: The article should be a subsection of CTU Los Angeles. And still needs to be cleaned up and expanded, at that. --Proudhug 17:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• SUPPORT: This is one of the few really creative and original articles on the site. It's something that even people who have watched every season multiple times can enjoy. Writing pages on actors, characters, and addresses can get kind of old. We could use more pages like this. - Xtreme680 19:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Moira O'Neal

• SUPPORT: One of the very few, if not the only significant article on the site that I would actually say is complete and finished. It's well written and interesting. Plus, it's a great chance to get the Expanded Universe up on the main page where mid-level fans can discover it. --Proudhug 14:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• SUPPORT: The problem is it's not a significant article. It's not a particularly interesting topic. Hell, if we're looking for completion, the Russian roulette article is looking fantastic. I guess it's well done, but there are just as many minor character pages that are just as well done and complete. Why this one? - Xtreme680 19:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)